If you don’t win, we don’t get paid: 509-567-3465
Washington law provides important protections for Spokane employees, particularly when a termination violates an employee’s legal rights. While Washington generally follows the principle of “at-will” employment, meaning an employer or employee can end the employment relationship without cause in many circumstances, an employer’s right to terminate an employee is not unlimited. A termination may be wrongful when it violates state or federal law, breaches an employment agreement, or violates a recognized public policy.
Common examples of wrongful termination include firings based on unlawful discrimination, retaliation against employees for exercising protected rights, whistleblower retaliation, or dismissals that violate employment agreements. Depending on the circumstances, employees may have legal remedies that include back pay, lost benefits, damages, or reinstatement.
Understanding the circumstances surrounding your termination is critical to determining whether your rights may have been violated. A Spokane wrongful termination attorney can evaluate what happened, particularly when a firing follows a workplace complaint, protected activity, request for leave or accommodation, or sudden change in an employee’s treatment.
Wrongful termination encompasses a range of unlawful dismissal scenarios. Although Washington generally recognizes at-will employment, employers cannot legally terminate employees for reasons prohibited by federal or Washington State employment laws.
Key circumstances that may qualify as wrongful termination include:
These actions may give rise to claims under Washington or federal law. Determining whether a termination was unlawful generally requires examining the reason given for the termination, its timing, workplace policies, communications, performance records, and how similarly situated employees were treated.
Terminating an employee because of a legally protected characteristic may constitute unlawful discrimination. Spokane employees may receive protections under federal employment laws and the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD).
Protected characteristics can include:
Other legally protected characteristics may apply depending on the particular law and circumstances involved.
Discriminatory termination is not always obvious. Evidence may include unequal discipline, suddenly negative performance reviews, exclusion from important projects, discriminatory comments, replacement by a differently situated employee, or a termination that closely follows disclosure of a protected characteristic.
Patterns and timing can be particularly important when evaluating whether an employer’s stated reason for termination was legitimate or potentially a pretext for discrimination.
Washington and federal employment laws protect employees from certain forms of retaliation when they exercise legally protected rights or report suspected violations.
Protected activities may include:
Retaliation does not always begin with termination. An employee may first experience reduced responsibilities, undesirable assignments, schedule changes, increased scrutiny, negative performance reviews, exclusion from meetings, or disciplinary actions.
Documenting these changes and establishing a timeline between the protected activity and the adverse employment action can be important when evaluating a retaliation claim.
At-will employment does not necessarily override an enforceable employment agreement. If an employee has a contract establishing particular terms or conditions regarding termination, an employer may be required to comply with those terms.
Employment agreements may include:
Whether an employee handbook, employer policy, oral statement, or other representation modifies an at-will employment relationship can be a fact-specific legal question under Washington law.
Employees who believe their employer violated an employment agreement should preserve contracts, offer letters, employee handbooks, policies, emails, and other documents describing the terms of their employment.
In some situations, an employee resigns because workplace conditions have become so intolerable that remaining employed is no longer reasonably possible. Under Washington law, certain circumstances may support a claim involving constructive discharge.
Potential examples of intolerable working conditions may include:
Simply experiencing an unpleasant workplace or disagreeing with management generally does not establish constructive discharge. These claims are highly dependent on the circumstances, including the severity and duration of the working conditions and the employer’s conduct.
Employees considering resignation because of serious workplace misconduct should consider obtaining legal advice before leaving their positions, when possible.
Employees who successfully establish a wrongful termination or related employment claim may be entitled to legal remedies. The remedies available depend on the specific law violated and the circumstances of the case.
Potential remedies may include:
Not every remedy is available in every wrongful termination case. Washington law and federal law can differ significantly regarding the types and amounts of damages an employee may recover.
Employment records, pay stubs, benefit information, tax records, job-search records, and documentation concerning the termination may all be important when calculating potential losses.
If you were terminated and believe the decision was discriminatory, retaliatory, or otherwise unlawful, it is important to understand your rights. Employment claims can be subject to different filing deadlines depending on the particular law and agency involved.
A Spokane wrongful termination attorney can evaluate the circumstances of your dismissal, identify potentially applicable Washington State and federal employment laws, and help determine your available options.
An attorney may also assist with gathering evidence, communicating with an employer, filing administrative complaints, negotiating a potential settlement, or pursuing litigation when appropriate.
The attorneys at Matern Law Group represent employees in workplace disputes, including claims involving discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and wrongful termination. Our team can evaluate the circumstances surrounding a termination and help employees understand their legal options.
To learn how we may be able to help, contact Matern Law Group for a confidential consultation.
Washington law recognizes constructive discharge in certain circumstances where an employee resigns because working conditions have become so intolerable that a reasonable person in the employee’s position would feel compelled to leave.
Constructive discharge is not established simply because an employee experiences an unpleasant workplace, unfair management, or dissatisfaction with their job. The circumstances surrounding the resignation, the seriousness of the conditions, the employer’s actions, and other factors may determine whether a constructive discharge claim exists.
Spokane employees should also understand that Washington generally follows the at-will employment doctrine. An employer ordinarily does not need to establish “good cause” to terminate an at-will employee. However, an employer cannot terminate an employee for an unlawful reason, such as prohibited discrimination or retaliation, or when doing so violates other applicable legal protections.
“Quiet firing” is not a specific legal claim under Washington employment law. The term generally describes situations where an employer intentionally makes an employee’s working conditions less desirable in an effort to encourage the employee to resign.
Examples might include removing meaningful responsibilities, excluding an employee from important meetings, repeatedly denying advancement opportunities, changing schedules, or otherwise marginalizing the employee.
While quiet firing is not automatically illegal, the conduct involved may violate employment laws if it is motivated by unlawful discrimination, constitutes retaliation for protected activity, breaches an employment agreement, or contributes to conditions supporting another legally recognized claim.
In particularly serious circumstances, conduct intended to force an employee to resign may also become relevant to a constructive discharge claim.
Washington generally follows the at-will employment doctrine, meaning an employer or employee can usually end an employment relationship without providing cause, unless an employment agreement or applicable law provides otherwise.
This means that an unfair termination is not necessarily an unlawful termination.
However, an employer cannot legally terminate an employee for certain prohibited reasons. Examples may include:
The distinction between a termination that is merely unfair and one that violates Washington or federal law can be critical when determining whether an employee has a legal claim.
A Spokane employee may have legal rights when an employer terminates them in violation of an enforceable employment agreement.
For example, an employment contract might require particular grounds for termination, establish a specific employment period, require advance notice, or contain procedures the employer must follow before terminating the employee.
Whether an employment agreement limits an employer’s ability to terminate an employee depends on the language of the agreement and the circumstances surrounding the employment relationship.
If an employer violates an enforceable employment agreement, the employee may potentially pursue compensation for losses resulting from the breach. The remedies available depend on the agreement, the nature of the breach, and Washington contract law.
Spokane employees are protected from discriminatory termination under federal and Washington State employment laws.
An employer may violate the law when it terminates an employee because of a legally protected characteristic, which may include race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, age, disability, pregnancy, marital status, veteran or military status, or other characteristics protected under applicable law.
Discrimination can sometimes be concealed behind a seemingly neutral explanation for termination. Evidence such as discriminatory comments, inconsistent disciplinary practices, shifting explanations, suspicious timing, or different treatment of similarly situated employees may help establish that an employer’s stated reason was not the actual reason for the termination.
Depending on the law involved, employees who establish discriminatory termination may have access to remedies such as lost wages, lost benefits, emotional distress damages, attorney’s fees, or reinstatement.
Washington State and federal laws provide employees with protections against retaliation for engaging in certain legally protected activities.
An employer may violate the law if it terminates an employee because the employee reported discrimination or harassment, participated in a protected investigation, requested a reasonable accommodation, exercised protected leave rights, raised certain workplace safety concerns, reported particular legal violations, or engaged in other protected conduct.
Retaliation claims often depend heavily on timing and evidence of the employer’s motivation. A termination occurring shortly after protected activity may be relevant, particularly when accompanied by sudden disciplinary actions, negative evaluations, shifting explanations, or other changes in treatment.
Employees who believe they were terminated in retaliation should preserve relevant communications and employment records and consider speaking with a Spokane employment attorney about their rights and potential remedies.
Our Practices are Guided by Integrity. We’ll protect what you deserve.
We work tirelessly and fight tenaciously to hold rights abusers accountable.
If you’ve experienced a distressing incident related to an issue like this, call us for a free case evaluation.
Legal cases can be lengthy, complicated, and confusing, but you don’t have to take on the system all by yourself. If you believe someone has violated your individual rights, or the rights of a large group of people in your community, we can help you find the right course of action.
"(Required)" indicates required fields
