Matern Law Group, PC - Los Angeles 1230 Rosecrans Ave., Suite 200
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 | Phone: (855) 913-1134

Matern Law Group, PC - Los Angeles (Downtown) US Bank Tower, 633 West Fifth StreetSuite 2818B
Los Angeles, CA 90071 | Phone: (855) 205-8186

Matern Law Group, PC - Oakland 1330 Broadway, Suite 428
Oakland, CA 94612 | Phone: (855) 893-0718

Matern Law Group, PC - Sacramento Capitol Mall, 500 Capitol MallSuite 2350
Sacramento, CA 95814 | Phone: (855) 206-0281

Matern Law Group, PC - San Diego Emerald Plaza, 402 West Broadway, Suite 400
San Diego, CA 92101 | Phone: (855) 435-4141

Matern Law Group, PC - San Francisco One Market Plaza Spear Tower, Suite 3676
San Francisco, CA 94105 | Phone: (855) 512-3291

In The News: Matern Features On Daily Journal Cover

Lawyers Warn of Pay Stub Litigation Wave

Matthew J. Matern, Daily Journal Cover Matthew-Matern-Daily-Journal-CoverJuly 6, 2015 – By Matthew Blake, Daily Journal

California businesses and their lawyers have perennially fretted about the state’s employee-friendly laws, but companies see one recent labor code amendment as beyond pale.

In 2012 Gov. Jerry Brown amended an existing law by creating a presumption of harm each time an hourly employee’s pay stub is missing any of nine required pieces of information, including total hours worked and wages earned in the pay period, the employee’s rate of pay, and the employer’s address and legal title.

While plaintiffs’ lawyers defend the law as a check on evasive employers, the strict liability businesses face is a “technical violation” that “cause no injury to employees”, according to Jennifer Barrera, policy attorney at the California Chamber of Commerce.

Instead, the suites are a “financial windfall to plaintiff attorneys” Barrera said. A case against staffing agency Manpower Inc. settled for $8.7 million in June, and a lawsuit targeting Verizon Wireless Inc. concluded with a $15 million deal for plaintiffs and their lawyers.

Francis J. Ortman, an employment defense attorney at Seyfarth Shaw LLP, said he keeps seeing instances in which a “disgruntled employee will find a plaintiff employment lawyer online and come to their office” for advice on hard to prove claims including wrongful termination or missing wages.

But “rather than shoot the half-court shot” and file a lawsuit alleging a difficult to prove violation, the lawyer asks to see the worker’s pay stub, and, if one of the nine items are missing, “the plaintiffs’ lawyer opts for the slam dunk” and files an almost impossible to disprove pay stub claim.

Ortman represents Applied Aerospace Structures Corp. in a class action over the company’s not providing its address on workers’ pay stubs – a frivolous claim, he said, because every Aerospace employee works at the same Stockton location. Geer v. Applied Aerospace Structures Corp., CU14-3137 (San Joaquin Super. Ct, filed July 18, 2014).

“We wanted to fight the lawsuit but it settled,” Ortman said, with a hearing on final settlement approval scheduled Tuesday in front of Judge Barbara A. Kronlund. “Because of the strict liability statute, we had no defense.”


Related posts

covid-19 employment litigation

The Next COVID-19 Employment Litigation Hotbeds

November 14, 2020

Soon, the lawsuits that have made up the bulk of coronavirus-related litigation thus far – primarily concerning safety and wrongful… Read More The Next COVID-19 Employment Litigation Hotbeds

Read more
Employment Law Legislative Roundup
Employee Rights

Employment Law – Legislative Roundup

October 4, 2020

Drama and suspense ran high as lawmakers worked through the weekend until midnight last month to meet the August 31st… Read More Employment Law – Legislative Roundup

Read more

Need to chat?