Matern Law Group, PC – Los Angeles 1230 Rosecrans Ave., Suite 200
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 | Phone: (855) 888-2577

Matern Law Group, PC – San Francisco One Market Plaza Spear Tower, Suite 3676
San Francisco, CA 94105 | Phone: (855) 888-2651

Matern Law Group, PC – San Diego Emerald Plaza, 402 West Broadway, Suite 400
San Diego, CA 92101 | Phone: (855) 202-0472

SAG-AFTRA & Byron Allen Can’t Settle Out Comedians’ Claims

NINTH CIRCUIT SAYS UNION SAG-AFTRA AND BYRON ALLEN CAN’T SETTLE OUT COMEDIANS’ CLAIMS FOR BREACH OF THE DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION AND VARIOUS LABOR CODE VIOLATIONS

Pauley, et al. v. CF Entertainment, et al. No. 14-55131
Pauley v. CF Entertainment, et al. No. 14-55155

case-shotAfter hearing oral argument, on March 25, 2016 the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claims for breach of the duty of fair representation and various Labor Code violations, including claims under California’s Private Attorneys General Act.

Plaintiffs Bernadette Pauley and Thomas Clark initiated class actions on behalf of comedians who appeared on the shows Comedy.TV and Comics Unleashed. Plaintiffs’ alleged claims for unpaid residuals, various labor code violations, and breach of the duty of fair representation against their union SAG-AFTRA and their employer Byron Allen, CF Entertainment, Comics Unleashed Productions, and Entertainment Studios.  After initiating suit, Defendant SAG-AFTRA initiated grievances against the employer-defendant. The district court dismissed the claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction while the grievance was pending.

On review, a three judge panel found that “the union cannot moot a claim that it failed to protect its members’ interests by later initiating a grievance and securing a settlement only after the aggrieved members turn to the courts for relief.” The court further found that because “The arbitration provision in the parties’ collective bargaining agreement does not expressly cover statutory claims. . . The union and CF Entertainment had no authority, therefore, to settle Plaintiffs’ statutory claims.”

Plaintiffs are represented by Matthew J. Matern and Tagore Subramaniam of the Matern Law Group.

Click here to view a PDF copy of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals memorandum.

Watch a video recording of the oral argument below:

Related posts

im3
Employment Law

Root Causes and Solutions for LA’s Homeless Crisis

August 7, 2018

Please join us to discuss Root Causes and Solutions For LA’s Homeless Crisis Thursday November 16th, 2017 from 6:00 – 9:00 pm at the SLS Hotel, Beverly Hills.

Read more
_distr
Employment Law

Women in Technology Summit Highlights Gender Gap in Tech Industry

June 15, 2018

The 24th annual Women in Technology International (“WITI”) Summit took place from June 10-June 12, 2018 in San Jose, California.

Read more